diff --git a/services/policy_evaluator_test.go b/services/policy_evaluator_test.go
index bf1343b..e2da380 100644
--- a/services/policy_evaluator_test.go
+++ b/services/policy_evaluator_test.go
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ package services
 
 import (
 	"authorization/models"
+	"strings"
 	"testing"
 )
 
@@ -687,3 +688,274 @@ func TestResolveVariablesAllAttributeTypes(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+func TestEvaluatePolicies_UserRegionMatchesResourceRegion(t *testing.T) {
+	// Test case from the logs: user.region = ${resource.region}
+	// User region should match the resource region provided in ResourceData
+
+	tests := []struct {
+		name            string
+		userRegion      string
+		resourceRegion  string
+		shouldBeAllowed bool
+		description     string
+	}{
+		{
+			name:            "same region",
+			userRegion:      "01",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: true,
+			description:     "user region matches resource region",
+		},
+		{
+			name:            "different region",
+			userRegion:      "02",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: false,
+			description:     "user region does not match resource region",
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			ctx := &models.AuthorizationContext{
+				UserID:   "U0000000001",
+				Resource: "personnel",
+				Action:   "assign_role",
+				UserAttributes: map[string]string{
+					"region": tt.userRegion,
+				},
+				ResourceData: map[string]string{
+					"region": tt.resourceRegion,
+				},
+			}
+
+			policies := []models.PolicyAttribute{
+				{
+					AttributeType:  "user",
+					AttributeName:  "region",
+					Comparison:     "=",
+					AttributeValue: "${resource.region}",
+				},
+			}
+
+			satisfied, reason := EvaluatePolicies(policies, ctx)
+			if satisfied != tt.shouldBeAllowed {
+				t.Errorf("%s: got satisfied=%v, want %v. Reason: %s", tt.description, satisfied, tt.shouldBeAllowed, reason)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestEvaluatePolicies_MissingResourceAttribute(t *testing.T) {
+	// Test case: when ResourceData doesn't have the required attribute
+	// The policy should fail because the placeholder cannot be resolved
+
+	ctx := &models.AuthorizationContext{
+		UserID:   "U0000000001",
+		Resource: "personnel",
+		Action:   "assign_role",
+		UserAttributes: map[string]string{
+			"region": "01",
+		},
+		ResourceData: map[string]string{
+			// Missing "region" key - this should cause policy to fail
+		},
+	}
+
+	policies := []models.PolicyAttribute{
+		{
+			AttributeType:  "user",
+			AttributeName:  "region",
+			Comparison:     "=",
+			AttributeValue: "${resource.region}",
+		},
+	}
+
+	satisfied, reason := EvaluatePolicies(policies, ctx)
+	// When resource attribute is missing, the placeholder stays unresolved
+	// "01" != "${resource.region}", so policy fails
+	if satisfied {
+		t.Errorf("EvaluatePolicies should fail when resource attribute is missing. Reason: %s", reason)
+	}
+
+	if reason == "" {
+		t.Error("EvaluatePolicies should provide a reason when policy fails")
+	}
+
+	// Check that the error message indicates missing attributes
+	if !strings.Contains(reason, "Missing required attributes") || !strings.Contains(reason, "${resource.region}") {
+		t.Errorf("Expected error message about missing resource.region, got: %s", reason)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestHasUnresolvedPlaceholders(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name     string
+		value    string
+		expected bool
+	}{
+		{
+			name:     "has unresolved placeholder",
+			value:    "${resource.region}",
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "multiple unresolved placeholders",
+			value:    "${resource.region} and ${user.department}",
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "no unresolved placeholders",
+			value:    "US",
+			expected: false,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "mixed resolved and unresolved",
+			value:    "US and ${resource.owner}",
+			expected: true,
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "empty string",
+			value:    "",
+			expected: false,
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			result := hasUnresolvedPlaceholders(tt.value)
+			if result != tt.expected {
+				t.Errorf("hasUnresolvedPlaceholders(%q) = %v, want %v", tt.value, result, tt.expected)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestExtractUnresolvedPlaceholders(t *testing.T) {
+	tests := []struct {
+		name     string
+		value    string
+		expected []string
+	}{
+		{
+			name:     "single placeholder",
+			value:    "${resource.region}",
+			expected: []string{"${resource.region}"},
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "multiple placeholders",
+			value:    "${resource.region} and ${user.department}",
+			expected: []string{"${resource.region}", "${user.department}"},
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "no placeholders",
+			value:    "US",
+			expected: []string{},
+		},
+		{
+			name:     "empty list when no matches",
+			value:    "",
+			expected: []string{},
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			result := extractUnresolvedPlaceholders(tt.value)
+			if len(result) != len(tt.expected) {
+				t.Errorf("extractUnresolvedPlaceholders(%q) returned %d items, want %d", tt.value, len(result), len(tt.expected))
+			}
+			for i, expected := range tt.expected {
+				if i >= len(result) || result[i] != expected {
+					t.Errorf("extractUnresolvedPlaceholders(%q)[%d] = %q, want %q", tt.value, i, result[i], expected)
+				}
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}
+
+func TestEvaluatePolicies_RegionBypassForAdminRoles(t *testing.T) {
+	// Test that region policies are skipped for roleID 1 (Super Admin) and 2 (Admin)
+
+	tests := []struct {
+		name            string
+		roleID          string
+		userRegion      string
+		resourceRegion  string
+		shouldBeAllowed bool
+		description     string
+	}{
+		{
+			name:            "roleID 1 bypasses region check",
+			roleID:          "1",
+			userRegion:      "02",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: true,
+			description:     "Super Admin should bypass region check",
+		},
+		{
+			name:            "roleID 2 bypasses region check",
+			roleID:          "2",
+			userRegion:      "03",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: true,
+			description:     "Admin should bypass region check",
+		},
+		{
+			name:            "other roleID respects region check",
+			roleID:          "3",
+			userRegion:      "02",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: false,
+			description:     "Non-admin roles should not bypass region check",
+		},
+		{
+			name:            "Super Admin role bypasses region check",
+			roleID:          "Super Admin",
+			userRegion:      "02",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: true,
+			description:     "Super Admin role string should bypass region check",
+		},
+		{
+			name:            "Admin role bypasses region check",
+			roleID:          "Admin",
+			userRegion:      "03",
+			resourceRegion:  "01",
+			shouldBeAllowed: true,
+			description:     "Admin role string should bypass region check",
+		},
+	}
+
+	for _, tt := range tests {
+		t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
+			ctx := &models.AuthorizationContext{
+				UserID:   "U0000000001",
+				Resource: "personnel",
+				Action:   "assign_role",
+				RoleID:   tt.roleID,
+				UserAttributes: map[string]string{
+					"region": tt.userRegion,
+				},
+				ResourceData: map[string]string{
+					"region": tt.resourceRegion,
+				},
+			}
+
+			policies := []models.PolicyAttribute{
+				{
+					AttributeType:  "user",
+					AttributeName:  "region",
+					Comparison:     "=",
+					AttributeValue: "${resource.region}",
+				},
+			}
+
+			satisfied, reason := EvaluatePolicies(policies, ctx)
+			if satisfied != tt.shouldBeAllowed {
+				t.Errorf("%s: got satisfied=%v, want %v. Reason: %s", tt.description, satisfied, tt.shouldBeAllowed, reason)
+			}
+		})
+	}
+}